Tire Aging Issue Needs Attention, Not Excuses - Now - Tire Review Magazine

Tire Aging Issue Needs Attention, Not Excuses – Now

Would you knowingly in­stall four "new" tires that are actually six to 10 years old – or older – on your son or dau­gh­ter’s car?

I already know your answer.

Neither would I.

And while most of you would never consider putting old tires on your children’s vehicles, I find it a bit disconcerting that – based on emails and reader comments I have received – some of you can still justify selling those same tires to your customers.

Sadly, this whole tire age thing has simply spun out of control. There are far too many dealers and association folks and executives and “tire ex­perts” defending the indefensible by continuing to point to “science” and “data” where “common sense” is now the only reasonable response.

The “service life is not determined by chronological age” fugue is as an­cient as the word “fugue,” and about as useful now. No one can argue that point…because there is no “science” or “data.”

A decade ago, when the whole question of “How old is too old?” rear­ed its head, that argument made some sense. But instead of going out and getting some “science” and “data,” TIA, RMA, tiremakers and others stood on soapboxes and de­clared that since none existed, there was no problem.

Here is an indisputable fact:Per­ception is al­ways reality. Perhaps not immediately, but sooner or later those two in­evitably converge. Tire and vehicle makers in Europe and Japan understood that, and took steps to deal with consumer perception before it spun out of control.

But not here. No, not here.

Americans don’t like their products hurting or killing them. They don’t even cotton to the hint of a paper cut. So after years of seeing TV news reports on tire aging and hearing from plaintiff attorney-supporter Sean Kane and reading online stories and talking to friends and family, many consu­m­ers became convinced that “old tires” were a real threat.

Consumers don’t care about ozone, weather, tire stacking, raw material quality and consistency, production equipment, what day of the week the cotton was picked and processed into casing plies, or any of the excuses we have heard for 10 years – and still hear today.

When it comes to buying “new” tires, drivers want actual new tires. Not something made four, five even eight years ago. They don’t want to worry if their “new” tires will hurt or kill them. And there is no amount of “science” or “data” that will convince them otherwise.

As the industry fell under attack for pushing “old, brittle, killer tires” on the “unsuspecting public,” we fixated on “science” and “data” and never heard what was actually being said.

This is a complicated issue (perhaps not as complex as some make it to be, though), but we have to start somewhere. Step One is to dig our heads out of the sand and admit that we have an epic PR problem.

Step Two: Take a page out of the Public Relations 101 manual and fight perception with a new perception.

Like I said, perception is reality. And I know that the folks at TIA and RMA (and their members) understand this. So, with that, the “old tires are bad” perception needs to be re­shaped into “here is advice that will make you feel confident with your tires.”

Now, this is not an absolute solution; it would take a roomful of law­yers 10 lifetimes to come to an agreement on airtight resolution, and we don’t have that kind of time. A noted public stance, however, would ease the perception burden, giving tiremakers the beathing space to eliminate the old tires they control from the market and create the systems necessary to prevent such from entering the market in the future.

It’s called “issuing a statement,” a tactic that appears to have worked well in Europe and Japan, from both tire producers and vehicle companies.

And that statement could read some­thing like this:

“The Rubber Manufacturers Assoc­iation and the Tire Industry Assoc­ia­tion and all of their collective members strongly recommend that unused tires (those that have not been in­stalled and/or driven on) should not be placed into service if they are more than six years old (based on the production date embossed on the sidewall of the tire), and that all tires should be removed from service and replaced 10 years from the date of their manufacture.”

Simple. Straightforward. No find­ing of fault or placing of blame. Most people, I suggest, would feel that their best interests were finally be­ing considered and addressed.

Perhaps this is all a bit naive.

But I do know that dealers are tired of taking the brunt of consumer anger, hoping their suppliers and representatives would step up.

Iknow we don’t want “death by 51 cuts” in the form of state-by-state or federal legislation. We’re staring that devil square in the face, and those battles are far from over.

Iknow you wouldn’t imperil your offspring.

What Idon’t know is if anyone will finally step up and deal with the real reality of tire aging.

You May Also Like

Finding Your Tire Shop’s Value Proposition

By following a few steps, any growing business in this field, new or old, will be better positioned to determine what their value proposition is, too.

State of the Industry service advisor customer

I founded RNR Tire Express (RNR) in 2000 with the objective to claim a spot in the tire and wheel marketplace as a Rent-to-Own (RTO) model, also sometimes referred to as “lease-purchase model.” I knew when first embarking on this business endeavor that there would be numerous tire and wheel stores competing against us, so everyone involved in getting RNR (then referred to as Rent-N-Roll) set up for success had to think about what was going to make the concept attractive to customers. We decided the RTO model would be the way to go.

Forging a Path Forward

The skills we learned from being distanced because of the pandemic will stay with us, but think of it this way: As the world opens up, what opportunities will it offer you?

Forging a Path Ahead
How the State of Our Industry Impacts Your Day to Day

In August, Tire Review is publishing special “State of the Industry” articles comprised of the thought-leadership editorial that takes a look at various trends shaping the global tire industry through the eyes of subject matter experts and industry influencers.

State of the Industry service advisor customer
Data-Driven Business Intelligence Boosts Profitability

Centered on a business-building theme, Tire Review’s new data section, Rolling with the Numbers, will provide business intelligence in key shop operations areas to help boost tire dealer profitability.

Vehicle Subscription Models Put a Twist on Consumer Choice

With a new vehicle representing consumers’ second-largest purchase, their expectation of inherent value, especially on big ticket items, raises the question of whether this move by automakers will be seen as a means to over-deliver on customer expectations, or a way to fuel their revenue pipelines to offset slumping vehicle sales numbers.


Other Posts

Waves of Change: Tire Review Makes Staff Changes

Tire Review is accelerating its efforts to keep you engaged, enthusiastic and curious about the growth your business can achieve.

TR Staff 1400
2021 Top Shop Competition Standouts Are the ‘Best of the Best’

These Top Shops lead by example, relentlessly focus on elevating their customers’ service experience, outshine their competitors, stand out in their community and commit to excellence, says Tire Review Editor Mary DellaValle.

Tire Review Top Shop Event
Customer Service Scripts vs. a Sales Process

When you manage and control the conversation, you have your best shot at controlling a favorable outcome.

The Value of Your Tire Business is at an All-Time High

National retailers and independent players alike are competing for market share and potential acquisition targets.

tire business value high - stout